Nick Record

Nick Record

Senior Research Scientist

Climate surprises - how do we prepare?

2 minute read

Published:

“Nothing is so painful to the human mind as a great and sudden change.” —Mary Shelley 1818

Our lab group recently collaborated on a paper just out, “The surprising oceanography of the Gulf of Maine”. We were broadly asking about ocean / climate surprises that have happened historically, and what we might have to prepare for in the future. The question is challenging and a bit paradoxical, because if we were prepared, it wouldn’t be a surprise. Yet the extreme events that catch us off guard are really dangerous.

Paper is here: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1973&context=mpr

There are different types of surprises we discussed. The sea level rise discussion captures one type of surprise called open surprises:

“For sea level rise, for example, we know that there is an on-going climate-driven process occurring, but sea level rise tends to do its damage during sudden events, where the background sea level rise is amplified by the coincidence of a high tide and a storm surge. This type of event can reshape a coastline suddenly and unexpectedly, even when people are aware of the issue.”

This turned out to be prescient, as just a month later, in early January of this year, we had a climate disaster in Maine where this process played out, causing major damage along the coast of Maine.

The other type of surprises, closed surprises, it a bit like the so-called “unknown unknowns”. We discussed a few possibilities:

  • New harmful algal or bacterial species affecting human health (e.g. Karenia, Pseudo-nitzschia, Vibrio)
  • Pathogens affecting fisheries directly, such as epizootic shell disease in lobsters
  • Extreme precipitation events
  • Some others, that we discuss in the paper

How do you prepare for the unexpected? There are a few ideas we discuss in the paper, such as something called “foresighting”. It’s a tough question, but there’s a shift in focus that we need in order to incorporate this type of event into our preparations. This quote from Wally Broecker in 1987 captures it well:

“My suspicion is that we have been lulled into complacency by model simulations that suggest a gradual warming over a period of about 100 years.”

If these topics resonate, check out the full paper, where we go into a lot more detail: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1973&context=mpr

You May Also Enjoy

Fitting communities into forecast system topologies

7 minute read

Published:

“Does the removal of urchins and perrywinkles lead to brown water?” This question is one of hundreds of hypotheses I’ve encountered working with community groups on forecasting projects. It’s one of the reasons that community-centered science is fun. The ideas I encounter in communities are far more wide ranging than what’s found among scientists, who are also interesting, but are often much more in lock-step with each other (McClenachan et al. 2022).

Non-profit publishers and citational politics

5 minute read

Published:

This week we discussed this article on citational politics. There’s a lot to unpack, from algorithmic bias in search engines to the motivation for “firsting” in science. The article also links to additional blog posts that delve into some of these topics. The further you go, the more you see how this problem is entangled with the other inequities that surround us. In our conversation yesterday, one question that came up was a pragmatic one— when doing literature searches to write papers, how can we use search engines to do what CLEAR calls “citing differently”?

Forget 2100

3 minute read

Published:

What will the world look like in the year 2100?

Will my Scientist job be replaced by a bot?

5 minute read

Published:

I read an unsettling tweet the other day. Yes, many boring conversations start with that sentence, but hear me out. The tweeter suggested that in the near future, all jobs will be better performed by artificial intelligence, or “AI”. This is part of the promise and the fear of AI–that we will all be replaced by bots. And yes, it’s possible that the tweet itself came from a bot, and not a human, but it started me down a path of wondering: How close is my job to being replaced by AI?